|
The purpose of this
course is to refresh nurses on medical record documentation requirements
and professional, responsible documentation strategies.
After completing the course, the
learner will be able to:
|
1. |
Identify at least one Joint
Commission documentation
guideline |
| |
|
|
2. |
Discuss The Joint
Commission's "do not use”
abbreviation list |
| |
|
|
3. |
Describe two different
documentation styles |
| |
|
|
4. |
Discuss progress note
formats |
| |
|
|
5. |
Apply strategies to avoid
legal problems with
documentation |
We live in a measurement culture.
Actions, observations, and intent
are all subject to review and
comparison to desired standards. In
order to meet pressures internal to
our profession as well as external,
records must be generated, stored,
and maintained. Medical
documentation has become a component
of health care as significant as the
rendering of hands on, direct person
intervention. Refreshing our
knowledge of documentation premise
and process is essential to hone our
professional technical skills.
Medical documentation refers to any
written or electronically generated
information about a client
describing services or care provided
to that client. Documentation may be
in the form of paper records or
electronic documents. Electronic
documents include computer created
medical record files, faxes,
e-mails, pictures, video or audio
recordings. Through documentation,
key observations, decisions,
actions, and outcomes can be
communicated, as well as preserved
in a lasting fashion. The intent of
documentation is the creation of a
lasting accurate account of what
occurred and when it occurred.
The challenge today is to provide
succinct but comprehensive records
that accurately portray the client's
experience while meeting the
standards of professional and
organizational care, regulatory
requirements, fiscal responsibility,
and criteria for reimbursement. This
record of care, a legal document,
includes information from nurses and
various other health professionals
who have contributed to client
outcome.
With the abundance of information
sources present in health care's
data rich environment, a definition
of exactly what elements comprise
the legal health record is
important. Guidelines from AHIMA,
the American Health Information
Management Association, suggest that
each organization be responsible to
define the content of the legal
health record in accordance with its
system capabilities and the legal
environment (Dennis, 2010).
Each health care facility must have
a compliance system able to guide
and ensure accurate and complete
record generation (e.g.
documentation), record maintenance,
and records destruction (when
appropriate). The American Health
Care Association (AHCA) offers
guidance to facilities to help them
comply.. In their recommendations
concerning the creation and
retention of records, AHCA lists the
need for each facility rendering
nursing care to address the
following items (Burgess, K., 2009).
|
Maintenance of records and
information in a safe,
secure place |
| |
|
|
Routinely creating and
maintaining hard copies of
electronic documentation |
| |
|
|
Limiting access to records
in order to prevent
fabrication or destruction |
| |
|
|
Development of document
retention and destruction
policies that are consistent
with applicable laws |
Legal health records must meet
accepted standards present within
each organization as well as those
applied by review or oversight
authorities such as the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services,
state and federal regulations, or
the Joint Commission on
Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations.
While organizations such as the
Joint Commission recognize that both
physical (e.g., paper charts) and
electronic health records must be
individualized to the unique needs
and settings of each care facility,
some basic components should
uniformly be present:
|
Client identifying data
|
| |
|
|
 |
Name, birth date, residence, sex,
blood type, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Known medical history |
| |
|
|
 |
Medical, surgical, medication,
family history, social,
immunizations, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Medical encounters |
| |
|
|
 |
Summations of interviews,
assessments, and interventions by
medical personnel such as
physicians, specialists, consultants |
|
|
|
|
Orders and Prescriptions |
| |
|
|
 |
Medical orders for specific
treatments or medications |
|
|
|
|
Progress notes |
| |
|
|
 |
Documentation – in chronological
order - of observations or care
given by all members of the health
care team that have led to the
client's current state of health |
|
|
|
|
Test results |
| |
|
|
 |
Laboratory reports, imaging studies,
pathology results, respiratory
testing, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Other information |
| |
|
|
 |
Such items as flow sheets (i.e.,
Intake and Output, Vital Signs,
etc.), Medication Administration
records, ECG tracings, informed
consent documents, educational needs
assessments, etc. |
|
|
|
Documentation in the client chart
provides a means by which health
professionals can communicate
information to each other. Notes on
what each of us observe as well as
how we respond with interventions,
or the formations of plans of care,
are entered into the chart..
Health care facilities are tasked by
organizations such as The Joint
Commission (TJC) or the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
to effectively manage the collection
of health information using uniform
data sets and policies that guide
record creation and handling. While
the components of the health record
may differ somewhat in each
facility, certain standards are
expected for both paper and
electronic documentation systems
(The Joint Commission 2009
Requirements, TJC, 2009).
Suggestions from external sources
can be very specific, such as the
2010 abbreviation use standard
(IM.02.02.01.EP.2) from the Joint
Commission. In this standard,
(formerly known as NPSG.02.02.01),
each hospital is required to have a
written policy that addresses the
use of abbreviations and symbols.
This policy is to address all orders
and medication related documentation
that are handwritten (including
free-text computer entry) or on
pre-printed forms.
|
The Joint Commission Information Management
Chapter,
2010 Accreditation Standards: Hospital,
Standard IM.02.02.01.EP.2
"Do Not Use” List |
Each hospital is to have a written policy that
includes the following:
|
Terminology and definitions
approved for use in the
hospital |
| |
|
|
Abbreviations, acronyms,
symbols and dose
designations approved for
use in the hospital |
| |
|
|
Abbreviations, acronyms,
symbols, and dose
designations prohibited in
the hospital, which include
the following: |
| |
|
|
Note: A trailing zero may be used
only when required to demonstrate
the level of precision of the value
being reported, such as for
laboratory results, imaging studies
that report the size of lesions, or
catheter/tube sizes. It may not be
used in medication orders or other
medication-related documentation. |
|
|
|
|
|
(2010 Portable Comprehensive Accreditation
Manual for Hospitals. TJC, 2009) |
The knowledge base offered within
the profession of nursing is full of
practical information. Common
practice experience leads to
acceptable ways of handling
information clearly and
consistently..
Progress notes are essential medical
records based on the nursing
process: assessment, nursing
diagnosis, planning with goal
setting, implementation/
interventions, and evaluation.
Progress notes serve to;
|
Establish a communicated
baseline |
| |
|
|
Record relevant data at
regular intervals |
| |
|
|
Provide snap-shot summaries
of a client's condition |
| |
|
|
Document changes in
condition |
| |
|
|
Document response, or lack
of response, to treatment |
Each care setting tends to specify
the patient data format or chart
note style that they prefer for
progress notes. Follow your
facility's documentation policies.
There are many charting styles
currently available. Each notation
format has advantages as well as
disadvantages. Some have been around
for a long time while others are
rather new. Many institutions blend
format systems together to get the
record-keeping style that works for
their unique needs. Whichever style
is used, communicate clearly to
avoid potential legal problems.
Careful forethought and practice
using a charting strategy will lead
to consistently clear and legally
defensible documentation.
Narrative-Chronological
The narrative note is the most
traditional medical record progress
note style. It involves the
documentation of assessment data,
interventions made and patient
responses in chronological order
with free flowing structure, content
and form. Many facilities rely
solely on this format, while in
other settings narrative notes serve
to supplement check-off forms and
flow sheets..
Narrative charting tends to be
thorough and detailed. It is also
time consuming. The narrative
chronological format is popular with
nurses who document complex
descriptions with comprehensive
assessments.
One key legal issue with this style
is that shift to shift, person to
person, inconsistency makes it
difficult to follow the patient"s
progress and plan appropriate care.
Each nurse may write her notes with
a unique style, thus making
continuity of care more difficult.
Since this form allows for
"free-flowing" paragraphs there is
more room for sloppy writing,
spelling errors, rambling repetitive
narration, inappropriate personal
opinions, and inaccurate language.
Although these problems are not
necessarily indicative of
negligence, a negative inference may
be made regarding the
"professionalism" of the nurse and
the facility.
To avoid problems, make certain that
each nurse tries to achieve a
measure of consistency with record
keeping. Perhaps decisions can be
made regarding the placement of
vital signs, patient outcomes, and
care rendered within each narrative
paragraph. Have a dictionary
available to help with spelling
problems. Handwriting must be
legible and descriptions of patient
observations must be precise. When
flow charts are used to document
vital signs, avoid repeating that
information in the narrative unless
there is a specific change that you
are addressing in the note.
Problem Oriented Medical Records
Problem area charting focuses on
specific needs rather than general
assessment information. POMR or
problem oriented medical record
systems frequently use acronyms to
provide memory aides as to the
structure of the progress note being
written. As POMR documentation
focuses on specific problems; it is
sometimes generically referred to as
"focus charting”.
Some problem oriented charting
acronyms:
|
SOAP – Subjective,
Objective, Assessment, Plan |
| |
|
|
SOAPIER – Subjective,
Objective, Assessment, Plan,
Intervention, Evaluation,
Revision |
| |
|
|
APIE – Assessment, Plan,
Intervention, Evaluation |
| |
|
|
DAPE - Data, Assessment,
Plan, Evaluation |
| |
|
|
DARE – Data, Assessment,
Response, Education |
| |
|
|
DARP – Data, Assessment or
Action, Response, Plan |
We will now look at examples of POMR
format charting as they move along a
continuum away from straight
narrative documentation.
SOAP - SOAP charting
follows a distinct format that
defines the various sources of
information followed by a plan of
intervention. SOAP stands for
subjective, objective, assessment,
and plan.
|
Subjective provides the
client's condition in a
narrative form using that
person's own words to
describe their condition and
concerns |
| |
|
|
Objective relates findings
such as vital signs,
observations from physical
examination, laboratory
results, measurements (i.e.,
weight, age, etc.) |
| |
|
|
Assessment summarizes
findings into a professional
observation of the patient's
condition such as is found
within the nursing diagnosis
system |
| |
|
|
Plan details what the nurse
will do to address the
client's needs |
SOAPIER - The basic
SOAP format for progress notes are
sometimes expanded to fit unique
organizational needs, such as;
|
Intervention that details
specifics of the Plan
formulated in the earlier
SOAP system |
| |
|
|
Evaluation of outcomes from
the nursing care plan |
| |
|
|
Revision of planned care
needed, based on the
evaluation that occurred
following the intervention |
DARP - DARP moves
further along the continuum away
from straight
narrative-chronological charting
into a combination of check-off
forms and flow sheets supplemented
with narrative progress notes. The
POMR style progress note usually
follows the DARP format;
|
Data gathered is related to
a focus issue (e.g., a
summary referring to
information found on a
checklist or flow sheet) |
| |
|
|
Assessment of the data with
additional information not
related by the flow sheet
(NOTE: Action is sometimes
substituted for, or
integrated into the
Assessment phase) |
| |
|
|
Response to the need brought
into focus during the
assessment of available data |
| |
|
|
Plan for continuing care
following the intervention
phase of the response (i.e.,
continuation of observation,
education of client,
notification of another
professional, etc.) |
Risk management strategies with this
charting style need to make certain
that nurses from the unit where the
forms will be utilized have input
into design of the check-off forms
and flow sheets. Ample room must be
present to record pertinent
information. Each institution should
provide the staff with sufficient
training to utilize the strengths of
this system to its best advantage.
Charting by Exception
Many consider charting by exception
((CBE) the antithesis to narrative
progress notes. CBE is a format
developed to overcome the recurring
frustration of lengthy, repetitive
narratives. It consists of a heavy
component of flow sheet
documentation with a blending of
POMR narrative added. Quickly marked
checklists and flow sheets document
normal assessment findings and
routine care. The narrative
documentation is limited to findings
outside the expected norm.
One strong advantage is that flow
sheet design can incorporate clearly
defined expectations for the type of
patients cared for on each unit and
in each care setting. A
standardization of forms process
within each facility allows
caregivers to provide consistency in
patient assessment and
documentation. The CBE system still
requires POMR documentation of
significant or abnormal findings yet
does not require narrative noting
when expected outcomes are achieved
by nursing interventions. Charting
by exception can reduce the amount
of time spent on documentation.
Charting by exception has the
potential to be a great asset to
electronic medical records
documentation. The use of quickly
scored checklists that document
routine matters complement
at-the-bedside computerized data
entry. By shifting the emphasis from
descriptive, discursive narrative
paragraphs for every routine and
expected event, CBE uses minimal
narrative notes for only unexpected
or highly significant events. CBE
may be the cutting edge of medical
documentation (Stansfield, K.,
Yetman, L., & Renwick, C., 2009).
Since charting by exception is a
departure from more traditional
medical documentation models, it can
lead to legal challenge. The biggest
problem noted seems to be the
appearance of large gaps of time
without patient contact. Although
this is not true, if no significant
observations are made, no notes will
appear in the record to prove the
nurse"s attentiveness. Likewise,
wellness promotion and preventive
care may not be a component on a
patient problem checklist,
preventing full credit for the work
done.
|
Let the Lawyers Speak…
"If it wasn't Charted, it wasn't Done” is
inaccurate and misleading,
according to Dan Small of the legal firm Holland
& Knight and Launa Rutherford of the firm
Grower, Ketcham, Rutherford, Bronsor, Eide &
Telan.
Good documentation is important, they continue,
but documentation is not care. "Nothing in the
law requires health professionals to document
everything they do or say. That would be
impossible.”
Charting should be "a way of trying to record
things that give a fuller picture of the care”,
along with specific key elements essential for
documentation. |
|
(Small, D., & Rutherford, L. Documentation Myths
in Litigation. 2009) |
Clinical Pathways
Clinical pathways (aka care
pathways, critical pathways, care
maps, or integrated care pathways)
are multidisciplinary descriptions
of the expected care for a specific
illness or condition with a
specified timeline of the
anticipated length of stay. Pathway
focus is on outcomes and efficient
use of resources while still
providing quality care. Pathways
have proven to be a good way to
identify variances from expected
outcomes and promote efficiently
organized care that is centered on
evidence-based practice..
Typically, pathways are written to
address a specific condition. It
usually includes the expected length
of stay, care setting, timeline,
assessment, multidisciplinary
interventions, patient activity,
medications, lab testing, patient
and family education, and outcomes.
Some facilities are using clinical
pathways in conjunction with
charting by exception. Use of
pathways is changing documentation
in many healthcare settings. Managed
care, for example, is heavily
invested in clinical pathways,
recognizing them as an important
tool for rendering and documenting
quality care.
The major focus for avoiding the
legal complications in clinical
pathways is the understanding of how
your facility is using them and what
supportive documentation is
required. At some facilities, the
pathway has replaced the traditional
care plan and progress notes with
documentation made directly onto the
pathway document unless the patient
does not meet the outcome. At this
point, a narrative note is made.
Computerized Records
Software programs are available to
capture patient data in a
computerized format. Depending upon
the system selected by the facility,
information may be entered by
keyboard, voice activation, mouse,
touch-sensitive screen, or a
combination of these methods. Some
systems allow the nurse to select
pre-written phrases to describe the
patient"s condition with very little
sentence formation performed by the
nurse..
|
Fear Factor in Computerized Health Record
Technology |
Concerns about electronic medical health records
in discussions among nurses often focus more on
the mechanics of the system and its availability
and security rather than on documentation format
styles. At heart, fears tend to revolve around
three main points commonly cited as
confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Often referred to as the "CIA” properties of
computer documentation;
|
Confidentiality demands that
no unauthorized party may
access sensitive information |
| |
|
|
Integrity requires that
information cannot be
altered by unauthorized
parties or by technical
errors |
| |
|
|
Availability demands that
sensitive services remain
available at all times |
Distrust regarding computerized
health records is a factor that
limits acceptance with the staff
asked to utilize them. The use of
consistent measureable security
processes and education concerning
the systems employed can help
overcome the fear of computerized
charting and documentation. |
|
(Weber-Jahnke, J., 2009) |
Ample education must be provided
before implementing a computerized
system. A "hard copy" of essential
information should be printed at
designated times to ensure an
accurate record in case of computer
problems. Error correction must be
completed before the information is
permanently stored, and all
information should be double-checked
before you enter it. Any corrections
made after storage will have to be
specially noted.
Remember the basics of HIPAA
training related to the use of
electronic medical documentation.
|
Never leave a computer
terminal unattended after
you have logged in |
| |
|
|
Do not leave information
about a patient on the
screen when others can view
the monitor |
| |
|
|
Never give your personal
password or computer
signature to anyone |
| |
|
|
Tell a supervisor if you
suspect someone may have
used your code. |
Certain guidelines apply regardless
of the documentation format you use.
The following tips will help ensure
that your record keeping can be
defended in the courtroom.
Legibility is essential. Never
second-guess someone else's writing.
Call the colleague for
clarification, if necessary. Correct
spelling and proper grammar are
crucial, not only for safe patient
care, but also because they enhance
your professionalism. Make sure a
dictionary is kept at the nurses'
station and post a list of commonly
misspelled words. Avoid
abbreviations completely when
possible. If you must use them, use
only abbreviations approved by your
facility.
Make sure you have the CORRECT CHART
before you begin writing.
The medical record is a permanent
legal "business record" and as such,
entries must not be made in pencil
or erasable ink. Write in permanent
ink. Stick to blue and black ink. As
a rule, courtroom proceedings will
use copies of the record. Copying
and electronic scanning machines
duplicate blue and black ink with
the highest clarity. If you use a
highlighter in your record, perhaps
as a way of noting discontinued
medication, make certain that your
medical records department can
effectively copy highlighted
information. Some copy machines
"gray out" any writing covered by
highlighter.
If anything is secured into the
medical record with tape (monitor
strips, blood product labels, etc.)
use double-sided tape or tape only
onto blank paper. Even though the
tape itself is clear and can be read
through by the naked eye, a copy
machine may "black out" the taped
area. Faxes must be copied prior to
inclusion in the chart. Unless you
have a plain paper copying fax, the
ink on the fax may be water-soluble
and fade in a matter of days.
EVERY PAGE of the record must have
the date and patient name. This is
required for a record to be admitted
in a courtroom setting.
Your complete signature is required
once per page. Your complete
signature is your name followed by
your professional designation.
When adding a progress note, follow
institutional policy to determine if
you are to note the time that the
entry is being added, or the time
that the observation took place.
Avoid block charting, such as "11:00
p.m. to 7:00 a.m.” This type of
documentation gives the impression
of vagueness. Note exact times of
all critical treatments, physician
contact, or notices to supervisors.
Any time you leave a message with
someone in a physician's office,
note the time and the name or title
of the person taking the message.
Make certain the "proper” person
does the documentation. For example,
The Joint Commission requires that
the initial assessment and care plan
to be performed and documented by a
registered nurse. Documentation by
the proper person is especially
important in educational,
nutritional. and rehabilitation
assessments.
Avoid documentation practices that
either allow or allude to alteration
or falsification of a medical
record. Eliminate excess white space
in your record. When making a
progress note, write flush to the
margin. Likewise when you have
completed your thought, draw a line
through any remaining blank space on
the line before signing your name.
Do not leave blank lines between
entries.
Do not make entries in advance. Wait
until things happen before marking
them down. Even the most predictable
events can get off schedule in
patient care.
To correct entries, put a single
line through the error then add your
initials and the date of correction.
You may note "error” or "mistaken
entry.” Do not use white out or tape
designed to obliterate typographical
errors. Do not correct another's
error. Likewise, if you do not agree
with an entry, do not record your
opinion next to the disputed entry.
Discuss your conclusions with a
supervisor to ensure that the
patient receives the best possible
care and the chart reflects respect
for all health care team members.
When possible, chart as soon as you
can after you make an observation or
provide care. This helps eliminate
the chance of forgetting important
data. Late entries, out-of-sequence
entries, or addendum entries may
sometimes be necessary. If the entry
is made on a following day, always
cross-reference the entry so that
the reader will read the additional
note in the proper sequence. The
following steps will eliminate
misunderstanding (Small, D., &
Rutherford, L., 2009):
|
Add the entry to the first
available line, |
| |
|
|
Indicate clearly "Late
entry,” |
| |
|
|
Record the day and time you
are writing the entry, and
|
| |
|
|
In the body of the
paragraph, indicate the day
and time of the previous
event now being described. |
Never chart for someone else. If you
did not participate in an activity
or observe someone else's care do
not write anything. If you are on
duty when a nurse calls to report
that she forgot to record a patient
interaction, chart it in the
following way:
"At 8:35 a.m., Nurse Joann Green
called and reported that at 5:30
a.m. this morning she observed…”
Understand countersigning. Only
countersign notes when required by
the institution.
|
If you merely review
someone's note, co-sign in
the following manner: |
| |
|
"Student Nurse name/Entry Reviewed
by Jane Doe R.N.”
|
If you actually participate
in the activity, co-sign in
the following manner: |
| |
|
"Student Nurse name/Jane Doe R.N.”
Keep documentation objective. Do not
chart opinions or assumptions.
Rather than writing "the patient was
unresponsive”, your notes should
report what you saw through
objective assessment. Document what
you see, hear, or smell. Avoid
entries like perhaps, maybe, or I
think.
Be careful to avoid labeling the
patient. For example, avoid
descriptions like demanding, drug
seeking, abusive, lazy, drunk, mean,
litigious, or out-of-control.
Instead, note observations as a
description of the behaviors.
Unusual occurrences and patient
injuries need documented.
Objectively record what you witness
without making any conclusions or
unsubstantiated assumptions. Use
quotation marks when documenting
comments from the patient, roommate,
or visitors,. Record the patient's
vital signs, physical condition,
mental condition, subjective
complaints, physician's notification
and arrival, and details of
treatment. However, do not mention
that an incident report or
occurrence report was filled out.
Always document a client's
uncooperative behavior. For example;
|
Leaving against medical
advice, |
| |
|
|
Refusing or abusing
medications, |
| |
|
|
Failing to follow diet or
exercise plan, |
| |
|
|
Refusing to follow
instructions to stay in bed
or ask for assistance, |
| |
|
|
Failing to give information
that effects care such as
complete history, current
medication, treatments, |
| |
|
|
Patient or family tampering
with traction, IV's,
monitors, |
| |
|
|
Failing to follow-up with
visits to clinic or
physician, |
| |
|
|
Bringing unauthorized items
into the facility |
Document any safeguards or other
preventive measures you are taking
to protect your patient (e.g., night
light left on, call light available,
floor clear of trip hazards, etc.).
Chart that the facility's
safekeeping for valuable possessions
system was explained and made
available to the patient. Encourage
patient/family to have possessions
sent home. If they agree, have them
sign their names next to a
documented statement to that effect.
Discuss the availability of a safe
and make sure that all items put in
the safe are recorded on a receipt
complete with the client's name and
ID number. Describe each item in
detail using objective language. For
example, yellow ring with clear
stone instead of charting a gold
diamond ring. Update valuables list
frequently for long-term patients.
Before a patient is transferred,
take an inventory of the valuables
list to verify location of items.
Document medication administration
as thoroughly as possible. Note the
date, time, your initials, the
method of administration, and the
site where the medication was given
if it is an injection. Document the
site of the infusion, the type and
amount of fluid, any medications
added, and the administration rate
of IV infusions. At least once a
shift, note the condition of the IV
site along with the type and size of
catheter. If a medication is given
for pain, note the site of the pain
and its severity. Then follow up,
noting the effectiveness of the
medication. When omitting a
medication, document the rationale.
For example, "pain medication held
pending stabilization of vital
signs.” If a medication order is
being questioned, tactfully document
your conversation with the doctor.
If someone is giving your patient
medication while you are off the
unit, make sure that person charts
that they administered the
medication.
Avoid verbal and telephone orders
when possible because of the high
risk of errors. However, it is not
always possible. The proper method
for documentation of verbal or
telephone orders includes:
|
Time and date of phone call, |
| |
|
|
Write the order verbatim,
and then read the order back
to the physician, |
| |
|
|
Document T.O./R.B.
(telephone order/read back)
or V.O./R.B. (verbal
order/read back) followed by
the physician's name and
your name |
Documentation of telephone orders, verbal
orders, and the reporting of critical test
results by either voice or phone fall under The
Joint Commission's "Read-Back” requirement.
Clarity and confirmation that the receiving
person has received and written exactly what was
intended is the purpose of read-back.
Implementation is exactly how it sounds. Read
back the order and get confirmation from the
person who gave the order.
Documentation that read-back has occurred should
follow the policy set by your facility. In
general, the notation T.O./R.B. and your
signature is acceptable though your place of
employment may require that "telephone order
read back” or "verbal order read back” be
written out. |
|
(Documenting Telephone Orders, 2008) |
Documentation of discharge
instructions should include
information related to: diet,
activity, medications (name, reason
for taking, dosage, and frequency),
skin care hygiene, specific
treatments, follow-up appointments,
and any agency referrals. Along with
the note relating that instructions
were given, document the patient and
family's comprehension of the
discharge instructions. If any
skills were demonstrated record the
patient's ability to return
demonstrate what was taught.
The primary purpose of medical
documentation is to establish that
individual's health status and need
for care, record the care given, and
demonstrate the results of the care.
Medical documentation allows for the
exchange of information between all
members of the healthcare team. The
health record provides legal proof
of the type of care the patient
received and that person's response
to that care. Medical documentation
that is poorly maintained,
incomplete, inaccurate, illegible,
or altered, generates doubt
regarding the treatment given to the
patient. Be factual when
documenting. Do not guess,
generalize, or give personal
opinions. Rely on your
professionally guided physical
observations. What did you see,
feel, hear or smell? Documentation
of patient care holds the healthcare
team members to professional
accountability and demonstrates the
quality care you have given.
Burgess, K. (2009). Creation and
Retention of Records. American
Health Care Association. Retrieved
June 18, 2010 from
http://www.ahcancal.org/facility_operations/ComplianceProgram/Pages/CreationRetentionRecords.aspx
Dennis, JC. (June 2010). Is Your
Facility Up-to-date On the Standards
for a Legal Health Record? South
Florida Hospital News and Healthcare
Report. Accessed June 26, 2010 from
http://southfloridahospitalnews.com/page/Is_Your_Facility_Up-to-ate_On_the_Standards_for_a_Legal_Health_Record/912/3/index.php
Documenting Telephone Orders.
(2008). LPN2009. Accessed July 2,
2010 from :
http://www.nursingcenter.com/library/JournalArticle.asp?Article_ID=800621
Small, D., & Rutherford, L., (2009).
Documentation Myths in Litigation.
Provider (Washington, D.C.), 35(7),
37. Accessed July 2, 2010 from
MEDLINE with Full Text database.
Smalls, H. (2009). Documentation
Do's and Don'ts. Neonatal Network:
NN, 28(2), 133-135. Accessed June
21, 2010 from MEDLINE with Full Text
database.
Stansfield, K., Yetman, L., &
Renwick, C. (2009). eDoc Evaluation
- At Eighteen Months into the
Challenge. Studies in Health
Technology and Informatics. Accessed
July 1, 2010 from MEDLINE with Full
Text database.
TJC (2009). 2010 Portable
Comprehensive Accreditation Manual
for Hospitals (CAMH). The Joint
Commission. Accessed July 1, 2010
from website:
http://www.jcrinc.com
TJC (2009). The Joint Commission
2009 Requirements that Support
Effective Communication, Cultural
Competence and Patient-Centered Care
Hospital Accreditation Program.
Accessed June 28,, 2010 from:
http://www.jointcommission.org/NR/rdonlyres/B48B39E3-107D-495A-9032-24C3EBD96176/0/PDF32009HAPSupportingStds.pdf
Weber-Jahnke, J. (2009). Security
Evaluation and Assurance of
Electronic Health Record. Studies in
Health Technology and Informatics.
Accessed July 2, 2010 from MEDLINE
with Full Text database. |